Intolerance

"I have a deep seated bias against hate and intolerance none more so when attacked by the intolerant who try to claim the moral high ground and in doing so demonstrate their deep seated intolerance of anyone who does not share their opinion.” 

I’ve been on Twitter for over 8 years. Despite some very robust exchanges I’ve never felt the need to protect myself or lock my account. Usually just blocking is all that’s needed. Today it changed.

I hold strong opinions anyone who follows me know that. I’m not hard-wired politically (albeit I vote conservative), religiously, socially or environmentally. That puts people offside at times because I don’t always follow the tribe. I share information I find interesting and things I know concern peeps within my group. I don’t use foul language or attack people personally unless they attack me. Even then I prefer humour or clever sarcasm to try to defuse an argument.  If people who don’t know me form opinions about my morals or beliefs based on one tweet I’m couldn’t be bothered trying to correct them. It’s a waste of my time.

My comments on politics and politicians are direct and I pull no punches. My motto is, I own what I say how others perceive it is their problem not mine. There are people who will always read into comments what they want so they can turn my opinions into a cause to criticise and attack. It’s all too easy behind the anonymity of an avatar and a twitter handle.  

Today I was subjected to the wrath of the Twitter leftist hit squad; along with a fair smattering of troll/bots if their follower numbers are a gauge; under 10 followers.   It was in response to a post I made a few days ago about a parody colouring book depicting Santa as a black man in a gay relationship. Funnily enough not one person made a negative comment about the book being a parody. Proves they don’t read things preferring to pick the eyes out of a comment to find anything to justify their attack.

I wrote, “Santa is now a gay man with a black husband. I could literally cry over what we’re doing to kids it’s criminal.” Hands up I got it wrong, Santa is black his white husband fills in for him. I included a link to the story.

What triggered my concern was the publisher’s statement the book is for all ages. I don’t give a flying fig if Santa is black, white or green with red spots. I simply don’t see what value there is bringing SSM into it. Marketing this stuff to adults is one thing but I don’t believe it’s suitable for little kids? I make no apology for it and nor should I have to. Because people see things differently it is NO justification to verbalise, insult or bully me because I don’t agree. Let’s just agree to disagree. That’s how grown-ups behave.  

Funnily enough in replying to one person, “if it rocks your boat, fine”, I was summarily taken to task by another who said my reply wasn’t acceptable. This gentleman (given further exchanges perhaps not the best handle as he was rude and condescending) thought I should have condemned support for the book. I did stress it wasn’t my business to tell others what to think. In response I was summarily “dismissed”, his words not mine. 

So you are damned if you don’t and you are if you do. The weird world of social media!!

The naysayers were in full voice condemning the practice of telling children Santa is real. The atheists chimed in stating telling kids Santa is real is as bad as telling them about a “guy in the sky.” The “but Jesus is black” mob joined the party. I was branded a bigot, a racist, a homophobe, a RWNJ and a snowflake along with a few other descriptions not worth mentioning

I was told to do things to myself which would be a physical impossibility. A couple of people said they hope I burn in Hell. It was told I was mad, ignorant and I shouldn’t be allowed on Twitter. I was taken to task over SSM based on my condemnation of the City of Sydney giving free access to venues for SSM services if the law passes. When my posts clearly stated my objection was about equality.

I was hit with wave after wave of comments, accusations, threats, likes and RT’s which just resulted in more accusations and attacks. I had to turn the sound off on my iPad the ding, ding, ding was driving me insane.

It was as they say open slather. And all because I didn’t agree with the theme of a colouring book that will be sold as all age appropriate. How absurd it that????

I tried to defuse the onslaught with humour. That didn’t work. So in the end I locked my account. I’ll unlock it in a few days but for now I need to protect my sanity.

I make no apology for worrying about what we are doing to kids. Childhood is brief. Bit by bit adults are infringing on those precious years pushing their agendas on kids rather than leaving them to enjoy their few years of innocence. We see it here with the Safe Schools and banning so many things we took for granted as kids. Things like birthday cakes in schools. The book albeit a parody was simply a trigger and a reminder of the world we now inhabit.

Mention was made of lying about Santa Claus and then breaking hearts when kids find out the truth and how wrong that is. I take a different view. Fairy stories and traditions like Santa Claus teach us a lot about life. It teaches us about goodness and reward and recognition. It teaches children about humility and giving. It opens up our minds to the wonderment of fantasy which stretches our imagination. It teaches us about disappointment and how to handle it; we learn life isn’t always fair.

I’ve wiped the eyes of little kids who have never experienced the joy of Santa Claus but would have given anything to have done so. That leaves a lasting impression. I think about my own childhood and the excitement leading up to Christmas. The visit to Santa was always a highlight. Tracking Santa on Christmas Eve was magical. Where I lived Santa arrived by plane. I spent hours gazing at the sky for a sign of a light.  If wanting that for others is the worst crime I commit in life, then I’m doing OK.

Myeshia Johnson Deserves Better

A lot has been written & said about Donald Trump’s handling of his call to Sgt. Johnson’s widow. Myeshia Johnson is only a young woman. She is now facing life alone with two small children and another one on the way. She appears to have been completely forgotten as each side lines up to take aim at other. She is the priority here, not the President.

It doesn’t matter what Donald Trump, John Kelly, you or I believe about the call. It’s how Myeshia Johnson feels that’s important. From all accounts, including feedback from her mother Myeshia Johnson was very upset after speaking with the President. That appears to stem more from the fact that Donald Trump didn’t even remember her husband’s name. But I’m sure the comment (confirmed by Myeshia’s mother) that Trump said, “He knew what he signed up for,” add to the hurt.

I have sympathy for Myeshia Johnson. My husband died suddenly while on his morning run December 2015.  He was fit and healthy his death was unexpected and tragic because he died alone on the street.  On hearing of the circumstances of his death an acquaintance said, “Well that’s one of risks.” I felt like hitting her. That’s like saying to someone who just lost someone in a motor vehicle accident; well they knew the risks when they got behind the wheel. In my case the comment stung me for weeks. So, given Sgt. Johnson’s circumstances I can understand how Myeshia Johnson must be feeling.

Donald Trump could have handled things so much better. It’s not good enough for people like General Kelly to dismiss the issue in claiming Donald Trump did his best. Sometimes our best is not good enough and we need to be honest enough to admit it. Donald Trump compounded the problem with his petulant and idiotic tweets. This is his modus operandi whenever he is criticised.

To be honest, I’m surprised General Kelly has allowed himself to be drawn into this fiasco. He has even resorted to lying in his attack on Congresswoman Wilson which is very disappointing. As for John Kelly citing his own experience on the death of his son, he forgets some important key differences. One, he was much old than Myeshia Johnson when he got the news. He wasn’t pregnant. John Kelly was a serviceman as was his son, she isn’t. He is a father; she is a wife and trust me it makes all the difference. In saying that I am not being dismissive of the devastation associated with losing a child.  However losing a husband brings with it a whole new set of other emotions and problems not experienced on the death of a child. One thing I have learnt over past 20 months is women experience grief differently to men.

If Trump had any compassion or understanding, he would have apologised to Sgt Johnson’s widow for causing more hurt and upsetting her even if it was unintentional. It’s called showing respect. Trump would have won a lot of admiration if he had. But it takes a man of honour to admit his mistakes. It is such a shame because it appears Donald Trump is too proud and I suspect too arrogant to ever admit an error. But isn't a sign of weakness to admit mistakes in fact it is a sign of strength.

As an example of how leaders deal with these stressful situations, someone mentioned this incident which involved President Bush. “President George W. Bush listened while a woman whose brother died in Iraq screamed at him and then hugged her to console her. He did not lash out.” Because whatever his flaws, President Bush understood the distress of woman who had lost her brother. There is the stark difference two Presidents.  

I don’t care what side of politics you are on it should never be used as a justification for overlooking  lack of compassion. I hope Myeshia Johnson finds the strength to see her through what will be the toughest battle of her life. I wish her well.

I hope the public brawling including attacks from the White House on those who in reality were only standing up and defending a grieving Gold Star Widow stop. Myeshia Johnson deserves better than this.

Energy Policy

The energy policy announcement has highlighted what has been blatantly obvious for sometime. The resentment of so many towards Malcolm Turnbull overrides any willingness to analyse and judge policy on merit. Despite what was announced this week which delivers on many of people's demands, the knockers just keep moving the goalposts.

One deluded little soul even claimed the Government’s energy policy is just Tony Abbott’s policy minus the Paris targets. People agreed with him. If that was true I would expect Tony Abbott and those same pro-Abbott supporters to be cheering and claiming victory over Malcolm Turnbull however they’re not. Instead, they are whining their little heads off. This highlights the idiocy of political debate driven by identity politics. It’s not about policy for some it’s about getting one back on the other guy.

Back to energy. It’s about time we faced facts. There is no magic pudding that will fix our energy mess. It has been a long time in the making so it won’t be turned around a few weeks; it will take years. Even then not everyone will get everything they want or demand. It is impossible to deliver all things to all people. So it is a matter of priorities. Whilst there are different priorities two impact the most on individuals and business; reliability and cost.

Our energy recovery time line will be driven by several factors. There are current legal agreements that must run the course. There are the required political negotiations with a hostile opposition being Labor/Greens. You can add to that mix  Micros like Pauline Hanson and One Nation who are already in the Labor camp criticising. Heavens knows how long those negotiations will take. That’s just on the Government side.

There are business leaders who have to convince boards to change direction. That’s no easy task. Plus, there is the imperative of attracting new investment to expand our traditional power sources to deliver stability. Let’s not forget regulators and other interest groups.

Trying to balance the needs of so many diverse stakeholders, including consumers is hard. You’d have to be naïve to think it isn’t. Whilst many only think of themselves the challenge goes well beyond. It pays to remember that.

Work has already started on costs. Recent Government pressure on power suppliers has delivered results. My new energy deal is significantly lower as a result.  All things being equal I should see a reduction of about $150 a quarter. Around $600 per year. The lesson is, pick up the phone and shop around. Far too many expect the government to do all the work and to deliver all their demands on a silver tray.

People are complaining about the measly price reduction under the policy announced yesterday. However, what about the perceived savings that will be delivered due to costs not rising? Plus that’s on top of any reductions we are currently enjoying.

Kerry Schott, chair of the Energy Security Board in responding to a question on the ABC about the guarantee said. “The guarantee is about providing a reliable power system and meeting the emissions targets set in the Paris agreement. What will happen when those mechanisms are put in place is that prices are likely to come down and they're likely to keep coming down.” That last comment is important. So, if we get the frame work right that’s what we can expect; prices to keep coming down. Win, win.

Josh Frydenberg pointed out yesterday, by 2030 the coal/gas share of the energy mix would be in the range of 64% -72%. He also rightly mentioned there were “more likely” to be upgrades or extensions in coal plants.  That should please conservatives. Now, the industry has some certainty on direction, I expect Josh Frydenberg is right and we will see that happen. You can’t expect business to invest if they don’t understand where Government or the country is heading. Now they have some certainty. You can bet Josh Frydenberg will continue to work with industry to achieve the coal/gas target assuming the government is re-elected. Given identity politics is rife in Australia there is no guarantee they will be. If we end up with Shorten and Labor all bets are off. So let’s not forget that. We play a role here.

Josh Frydenberg has also pointed out the new model is premised on ideas of no subsidies, no taxes, no trading schemes. Isn’t that what everyone has been screaming for? We also have the commitment of guaranteed supply something individuals and business has demanded. I would have thought that would generate some acknowledgement and credit  from the conservative side, but no it didn’t. Why? Because for a significant number their loathing for Turnbull is so entrenched they can’t give him credit for anything. That has to be the classic cut off your nose off spite your face scenario is ever there was one.

From where I sit there is a lot more positives than negatives in what was announced. More detail needs to be released however, on what we’ve been given it is a significant shift in the right direction. More should be encouraged.

If conservative voters want additional things like more coal fired power stations and nuclear power, then give the conservative Government the power to deliver it. Stop playing  “I’ll place my bet each way” and stymying the Government in the Senate. Labor, Greens, Independents and cause parties are not the solution. I also ask myself this question. Why would any Government continue to battle against the tide, when so called supporters have tied Governments hands behind their back as they did in 2013 and again in 2016. Why would any decent candidate sign up for that?

As Australians we have always prided ourselves on fairness. Giving people a fair go. I include giving my elected Government a fair go as well, when deserved. As a nation, and to our shame we seem to have lost our way on a fair go. I hope commonsense returns soon. Because identity politics is wrecking this country. When it’s reaches the point where sensible policy is dismissed based on who delivers it and not what it contains that in my humble opinion is insanity.