Closing Mental Hospitals Was A Mistake

We’ve now experienced two attacks in Melbourne where people have been killed or badly injured by people suffering from a combination of mental health & drugs issues. 

In the last incident police confirmed the alleged attacker was known to them. That appears to show police have been involved because of behavioural issues in the past. There was a time people with mental health issues were placed in facilities where they could be cared for. They were not exposed to media or entertainment where they are then at risk of playing out what they see such as copy cat plowing into people with motor vehicles. They were controlled and, kept away from society. But, the do-gooders knew best and, they fought to close mental hospitals. So now far too many of  these people walk the streets drugged up on ice and, God knows what else. Then the authorities gasp in horror when attacks are carried out as they were yesterday. Well, it’s about time they woke up to themselves and did something about taking these people off the streets. 

It’s all fine and dandy to defend people’s rights to live freely. But that can not be at the expense of the lives of others. Closing mental hospitals was a mistake. Until recent times attacks by people suffering mental illness were limited albeit still devastating. But the violence level is increasing as people are subjected to more violence on our TV screens and, easier access to drugs. The authorities and our politicians need to act and fast before more people lose their lives.

🎶🎶Look At The Scoreboard🎶🎶

Kristina Keneally has always struck me as the epitome of the vacuous blond. Her performances on SkyNews are torturous to watch. In fact, I can’t watch them. If ever you needed proof, she is a vacuous blond here is the proof. 

In referring to the Bennelong by-election she made these comments. 

First, in her attempt to take a swipe at Prime Minister Turnbull along with trying to talk up Labor’s loss she said; 

“Mr Turnbull had “injected himself” into the campaign by admitting it was a vote on his government. “There is no doubt that he owns this result. There’s no escaping it.”

Yes, dear he does and his party represented by John Alexander won. But thank you for so graciously acknowledging it not that it was your intention. 

Ms Keneally continued; 

“I am here to claim success for the Labor movement,” Ms Keneally told supporters at Club Ryde. 

Err no dear, you lost. The other side won and that is success.. 

So based on those two comments. 

Keneally 0 - Winners 2

Based on the election result.

Labor 0 – Liberals 1

And to use that great old English football chant. Conservatives are you ready. 

Turnbull:  Is that not the scoreboard?

Conservatives: Yes, that is the scoreboard!

Turnbull: Is that not a 1?

Conservatives: Yes, that is a 1!

Turnbull: Is that not a 0?

Conservatives: Yes, that is a 0!

Turnbull:  Is that not the winning team?

Conservatives: Yes, that is the winning team!

Turnbull:  Is that not the losing team?

Conservatives:  Yes, that is the losing team!

All (pointing):  Winning team!  Losing team!  Winning team! Losing team! Yay!

..”🎶🎶Look at the scoreboard🎶🎶

A Political Spy Novel? If Only It Was..

The leader of a foreign power declares he did not interfere in the US election. Donald Trump believes he is sincere. This is not just just any foreign power, it is Russia. Trump in turn attacks former U.S. intelligence officials labelling them “hacks”. Trump admits he believes the leader of a foreign power over his fellow countrymen and women. 

In all likelihood if Putin did interfered, he wouldn’t admit to it. If Donald Trump and his team conspired with Putin does anyone seriously think Trump will admit to that? He won’t given the  investigation underway in the US. So I’d take what was said with a grain of salt. 

Now for some facts. In the past two weeks, various Trump campaign advisers including George Papadopoulos and Carter Page have confessed to having met with or conspired with the Russian government during the election. I repeat, they confessed they met with or conspired with the Russians. How far this went will probably not be known until the commencement of any court cases following the conclusion of current investigations.  

Papadopoulos and Carter then named higher level Trump campaign officials who were also involved. Some of those officials have now admitted they knew all along about the engagement with the Russians. In addition, Trump’s campaign chairman is under house arrest in relations to the Trump-Russia scandal. 

Despite the above, Putin said he didn’t do it. Trump, said he believes Putin because he is sincere. I’m not sure it’s wise to be so trusting of anyone who is ex-KGB. Particularly someone with a chequered past like Putin. But this is where it gets bizarre. 

If Putin and Trump are telling the truth; with a major emphasis on IF. That would mean Papadopoulos, Carter and the rest have lied.  Why would they lie? It makes no sense for them to risk jail confessing to something that never happened. That would be bizarre in the extreme.  If anyone has an answer as to why anyone would compromise themselves like that I’d love to hear it. 

Following the Putin, Trump declarations, Trump copped a backlash over siding with Putin. In true form Trump took to twitter attacking his fellow Americans as “haters and fools.” According to the latest polls the majority of Americans now believe the Trump campaign and Russia conspired with each other during the election. 59% believe Trump himself knew last year that anyone associated with his campaign had contact with suspected Russian operatives. That means The President of the United States has now called the majority of Americans “haters and fools.” I don’t recall any other President ever doing that. Certainly not siding with the leader of a foreign power and attacking his own people. 

As a script for a political spy novel is might be a riveting story line. As a real life drama involving the President of the United States it’s alarming. 

It’s Time To Go Malcolm

Towards the end of Tony Abbott’s reign I was open in sharing in views that he either had to make changes or hand over to someone who would. He was warned of the consequences of failing to act. When he didn’t, the inevitable happened. Prior to that change I was also vocal in my criticism of Malcolm Turnbull. Albeit I don’t believe he was the major source of white-anting against Abbott. 

I’ve never been a huge fan of Abbott’s. But as a Liberal member I prefer LNP policies to the opposition. My loyalty is to the party so, I supported Abbott and defended his less than desirable actions. That was until there were just too many failures for me. I would have preferred Tony Abbott to have wised up and stepped down but he couldn’t see or accept there was a problem. He paid the price. 

Likewise, I’m not and never have been a huge fan of Malcolm Turnbull. But as the new leader of my party I was prepared to give him a go. To be fair, the Turnbull led government hasn’t done as bad a job as the chatter would have you believe. But we need more than that. We need strong dynamic leadership. We need a voice that can command attention and respect despite the message not always being what people want to hear. We need a voice that can get the message out there and stop the decline. We need a voice that can define the vision and get people enthused about it. Malcolm sadly is not that voice. It’s been two years of hoping for change. It’s not happening. 

I don’t support overthrowing leaders. But if they won’t listen sometimes for the greater good, it’s the only option. It time for someone to knock on Malcolm’s door and convince him it’s time to go. But to go gracefully on his terms if need be but go he must. My dilemma is I can’t see an inspiring replacement. All the usual suspects come with baggage. Perhaps we need a ‘left-fielder’. Someone with no baggage. Who it is I don’t know. But they need to stick their head up now. We’re running out of time.

We Want A Citizenship Audit Now...

I’m becoming increasingly pee’d off with calls for a citizenship audit being ignored (or worse dismissed) by our elected representatives. It’s not good enough for politicians like Finance Minister Mathias Cormann to argue an audit would unfairly put the presumption of guilt on politicians. There is nothing unfair about it Mr Cormann. The refusal is what is leading to the presumption of guilt. What have you got to hide?

Many companies ask for proof of your eligibility to work in this country. Politicians in fact expect business to do it to ensure they are not unwittingly hiring illegal workers. Most reasonable people would say that is fair enough. Therefore, we as the employers of our politicians have every right to demand the same from them. Even more so given the absurdity of the circumstances that has lead to some of those ‘we hired’ having to resign. The High Court has now defined the rules and we need to be ensure (to OUR satisfaction) that everyone who remains in office is in compliance.

It’s a simple request, so why the stalling? Just do it and put this one to bed. Then we can get back to the real business of government.

Intolerance

"I have a deep seated bias against hate and intolerance none more so when attacked by the intolerant who try to claim the moral high ground and in doing so demonstrate their deep seated intolerance of anyone who does not share their opinion.” 

I’ve been on Twitter for over 8 years. Despite some very robust exchanges I’ve never felt the need to protect myself or lock my account. Usually just blocking is all that’s needed. Today it changed.

I hold strong opinions anyone who follows me know that. I’m not hard-wired politically (albeit I vote conservative), religiously, socially or environmentally. That puts people offside at times because I don’t always follow the tribe. I share information I find interesting and things I know concern peeps within my group. I don’t use foul language or attack people personally unless they attack me. Even then I prefer humour or clever sarcasm to try to defuse an argument.  If people who don’t know me form opinions about my morals or beliefs based on one tweet I’m couldn’t be bothered trying to correct them. It’s a waste of my time.

My comments on politics and politicians are direct and I pull no punches. My motto is, I own what I say how others perceive it is their problem not mine. There are people who will always read into comments what they want so they can turn my opinions into a cause to criticise and attack. It’s all too easy behind the anonymity of an avatar and a twitter handle.  

Today I was subjected to the wrath of the Twitter leftist hit squad; along with a fair smattering of troll/bots if their follower numbers are a gauge; under 10 followers.   It was in response to a post I made a few days ago about a parody colouring book depicting Santa as a black man in a gay relationship. Funnily enough not one person made a negative comment about the book being a parody. Proves they don’t read things preferring to pick the eyes out of a comment to find anything to justify their attack.

I wrote, “Santa is now a gay man with a black husband. I could literally cry over what we’re doing to kids it’s criminal.” Hands up I got it wrong, Santa is black his white husband fills in for him. I included a link to the story.

What triggered my concern was the publisher’s statement the book is for all ages. I don’t give a flying fig if Santa is black, white or green with red spots. I simply don’t see what value there is bringing SSM into it. Marketing this stuff to adults is one thing but I don’t believe it’s suitable for little kids? I make no apology for it and nor should I have to. Because people see things differently it is NO justification to verbalise, insult or bully me because I don’t agree. Let’s just agree to disagree. That’s how grown-ups behave.  

Funnily enough in replying to one person, “if it rocks your boat, fine”, I was summarily taken to task by another who said my reply wasn’t acceptable. This gentleman (given further exchanges perhaps not the best handle as he was rude and condescending) thought I should have condemned support for the book. I did stress it wasn’t my business to tell others what to think. In response I was summarily “dismissed”, his words not mine. 

So you are damned if you don’t and you are if you do. The weird world of social media!!

The naysayers were in full voice condemning the practice of telling children Santa is real. The atheists chimed in stating telling kids Santa is real is as bad as telling them about a “guy in the sky.” The “but Jesus is black” mob joined the party. I was branded a bigot, a racist, a homophobe, a RWNJ and a snowflake along with a few other descriptions not worth mentioning

I was told to do things to myself which would be a physical impossibility. A couple of people said they hope I burn in Hell. It was told I was mad, ignorant and I shouldn’t be allowed on Twitter. I was taken to task over SSM based on my condemnation of the City of Sydney giving free access to venues for SSM services if the law passes. When my posts clearly stated my objection was about equality.

I was hit with wave after wave of comments, accusations, threats, likes and RT’s which just resulted in more accusations and attacks. I had to turn the sound off on my iPad the ding, ding, ding was driving me insane.

It was as they say open slather. And all because I didn’t agree with the theme of a colouring book that will be sold as all age appropriate. How absurd it that????

I tried to defuse the onslaught with humour. That didn’t work. So in the end I locked my account. I’ll unlock it in a few days but for now I need to protect my sanity.

I make no apology for worrying about what we are doing to kids. Childhood is brief. Bit by bit adults are infringing on those precious years pushing their agendas on kids rather than leaving them to enjoy their few years of innocence. We see it here with the Safe Schools and banning so many things we took for granted as kids. Things like birthday cakes in schools. The book albeit a parody was simply a trigger and a reminder of the world we now inhabit.

Mention was made of lying about Santa Claus and then breaking hearts when kids find out the truth and how wrong that is. I take a different view. Fairy stories and traditions like Santa Claus teach us a lot about life. It teaches us about goodness and reward and recognition. It teaches children about humility and giving. It opens up our minds to the wonderment of fantasy which stretches our imagination. It teaches us about disappointment and how to handle it; we learn life isn’t always fair.

I’ve wiped the eyes of little kids who have never experienced the joy of Santa Claus but would have given anything to have done so. That leaves a lasting impression. I think about my own childhood and the excitement leading up to Christmas. The visit to Santa was always a highlight. Tracking Santa on Christmas Eve was magical. Where I lived Santa arrived by plane. I spent hours gazing at the sky for a sign of a light.  If wanting that for others is the worst crime I commit in life, then I’m doing OK.

Myeshia Johnson Deserves Better

A lot has been written & said about Donald Trump’s handling of his call to Sgt. Johnson’s widow. Myeshia Johnson is only a young woman. She is now facing life alone with two small children and another one on the way. She appears to have been completely forgotten as each side lines up to take aim at other. She is the priority here, not the President.

It doesn’t matter what Donald Trump, John Kelly, you or I believe about the call. It’s how Myeshia Johnson feels that’s important. From all accounts, including feedback from her mother Myeshia Johnson was very upset after speaking with the President. That appears to stem more from the fact that Donald Trump didn’t even remember her husband’s name. But I’m sure the comment (confirmed by Myeshia’s mother) that Trump said, “He knew what he signed up for,” add to the hurt.

I have sympathy for Myeshia Johnson. My husband died suddenly while on his morning run December 2015.  He was fit and healthy his death was unexpected and tragic because he died alone on the street.  On hearing of the circumstances of his death an acquaintance said, “Well that’s one of risks.” I felt like hitting her. That’s like saying to someone who just lost someone in a motor vehicle accident; well they knew the risks when they got behind the wheel. In my case the comment stung me for weeks. So, given Sgt. Johnson’s circumstances I can understand how Myeshia Johnson must be feeling.

Donald Trump could have handled things so much better. It’s not good enough for people like General Kelly to dismiss the issue in claiming Donald Trump did his best. Sometimes our best is not good enough and we need to be honest enough to admit it. Donald Trump compounded the problem with his petulant and idiotic tweets. This is his modus operandi whenever he is criticised.

To be honest, I’m surprised General Kelly has allowed himself to be drawn into this fiasco. He has even resorted to lying in his attack on Congresswoman Wilson which is very disappointing. As for John Kelly citing his own experience on the death of his son, he forgets some important key differences. One, he was much old than Myeshia Johnson when he got the news. He wasn’t pregnant. John Kelly was a serviceman as was his son, she isn’t. He is a father; she is a wife and trust me it makes all the difference. In saying that I am not being dismissive of the devastation associated with losing a child.  However losing a husband brings with it a whole new set of other emotions and problems not experienced on the death of a child. One thing I have learnt over past 20 months is women experience grief differently to men.

If Trump had any compassion or understanding, he would have apologised to Sgt Johnson’s widow for causing more hurt and upsetting her even if it was unintentional. It’s called showing respect. Trump would have won a lot of admiration if he had. But it takes a man of honour to admit his mistakes. It is such a shame because it appears Donald Trump is too proud and I suspect too arrogant to ever admit an error. But isn't a sign of weakness to admit mistakes in fact it is a sign of strength.

As an example of how leaders deal with these stressful situations, someone mentioned this incident which involved President Bush. “President George W. Bush listened while a woman whose brother died in Iraq screamed at him and then hugged her to console her. He did not lash out.” Because whatever his flaws, President Bush understood the distress of woman who had lost her brother. There is the stark difference two Presidents.  

I don’t care what side of politics you are on it should never be used as a justification for overlooking  lack of compassion. I hope Myeshia Johnson finds the strength to see her through what will be the toughest battle of her life. I wish her well.

I hope the public brawling including attacks from the White House on those who in reality were only standing up and defending a grieving Gold Star Widow stop. Myeshia Johnson deserves better than this.

Energy Policy

The energy policy announcement has highlighted what has been blatantly obvious for sometime. The resentment of so many towards Malcolm Turnbull overrides any willingness to analyse and judge policy on merit. Despite what was announced this week which delivers on many of people's demands, the knockers just keep moving the goalposts.

One deluded little soul even claimed the Government’s energy policy is just Tony Abbott’s policy minus the Paris targets. People agreed with him. If that was true I would expect Tony Abbott and those same pro-Abbott supporters to be cheering and claiming victory over Malcolm Turnbull however they’re not. Instead, they are whining their little heads off. This highlights the idiocy of political debate driven by identity politics. It’s not about policy for some it’s about getting one back on the other guy.

Back to energy. It’s about time we faced facts. There is no magic pudding that will fix our energy mess. It has been a long time in the making so it won’t be turned around a few weeks; it will take years. Even then not everyone will get everything they want or demand. It is impossible to deliver all things to all people. So it is a matter of priorities. Whilst there are different priorities two impact the most on individuals and business; reliability and cost.

Our energy recovery time line will be driven by several factors. There are current legal agreements that must run the course. There are the required political negotiations with a hostile opposition being Labor/Greens. You can add to that mix  Micros like Pauline Hanson and One Nation who are already in the Labor camp criticising. Heavens knows how long those negotiations will take. That’s just on the Government side.

There are business leaders who have to convince boards to change direction. That’s no easy task. Plus, there is the imperative of attracting new investment to expand our traditional power sources to deliver stability. Let’s not forget regulators and other interest groups.

Trying to balance the needs of so many diverse stakeholders, including consumers is hard. You’d have to be naïve to think it isn’t. Whilst many only think of themselves the challenge goes well beyond. It pays to remember that.

Work has already started on costs. Recent Government pressure on power suppliers has delivered results. My new energy deal is significantly lower as a result.  All things being equal I should see a reduction of about $150 a quarter. Around $600 per year. The lesson is, pick up the phone and shop around. Far too many expect the government to do all the work and to deliver all their demands on a silver tray.

People are complaining about the measly price reduction under the policy announced yesterday. However, what about the perceived savings that will be delivered due to costs not rising? Plus that’s on top of any reductions we are currently enjoying.

Kerry Schott, chair of the Energy Security Board in responding to a question on the ABC about the guarantee said. “The guarantee is about providing a reliable power system and meeting the emissions targets set in the Paris agreement. What will happen when those mechanisms are put in place is that prices are likely to come down and they're likely to keep coming down.” That last comment is important. So, if we get the frame work right that’s what we can expect; prices to keep coming down. Win, win.

Josh Frydenberg pointed out yesterday, by 2030 the coal/gas share of the energy mix would be in the range of 64% -72%. He also rightly mentioned there were “more likely” to be upgrades or extensions in coal plants.  That should please conservatives. Now, the industry has some certainty on direction, I expect Josh Frydenberg is right and we will see that happen. You can’t expect business to invest if they don’t understand where Government or the country is heading. Now they have some certainty. You can bet Josh Frydenberg will continue to work with industry to achieve the coal/gas target assuming the government is re-elected. Given identity politics is rife in Australia there is no guarantee they will be. If we end up with Shorten and Labor all bets are off. So let’s not forget that. We play a role here.

Josh Frydenberg has also pointed out the new model is premised on ideas of no subsidies, no taxes, no trading schemes. Isn’t that what everyone has been screaming for? We also have the commitment of guaranteed supply something individuals and business has demanded. I would have thought that would generate some acknowledgement and credit  from the conservative side, but no it didn’t. Why? Because for a significant number their loathing for Turnbull is so entrenched they can’t give him credit for anything. That has to be the classic cut off your nose off spite your face scenario is ever there was one.

From where I sit there is a lot more positives than negatives in what was announced. More detail needs to be released however, on what we’ve been given it is a significant shift in the right direction. More should be encouraged.

If conservative voters want additional things like more coal fired power stations and nuclear power, then give the conservative Government the power to deliver it. Stop playing  “I’ll place my bet each way” and stymying the Government in the Senate. Labor, Greens, Independents and cause parties are not the solution. I also ask myself this question. Why would any Government continue to battle against the tide, when so called supporters have tied Governments hands behind their back as they did in 2013 and again in 2016. Why would any decent candidate sign up for that?

As Australians we have always prided ourselves on fairness. Giving people a fair go. I include giving my elected Government a fair go as well, when deserved. As a nation, and to our shame we seem to have lost our way on a fair go. I hope commonsense returns soon. Because identity politics is wrecking this country. When it’s reaches the point where sensible policy is dismissed based on who delivers it and not what it contains that in my humble opinion is insanity.

Same Sex Marriage Delarations

I will not be sharing how I vote on SSM on Facebook or any other social media site. How I vote is my business, no one else's. 

I don't have the urge to join the public declaration crowd. Why? Because I don't need anyone’s validation on whether I'm doing the right or wrong thing. The only person I have to justify my decision to is myself. 

More importantly I have friends in both camps. Friends I greatly respect along with respecting their right to hold their views. I won't be pushing my opinion down their throats. Or trying to guilt trip them into changing their minds as some have attempted to do. 

When I read declarations from people stating they will no longer associate with people based on how they vote I think debate has reached a whole new level of crazy. I judge people for who they are not what they believe. On how they treat others and how they treat me. So, I will still think my friends are awesome whether they vote Yes or No. Ticking a box won't change that. 

George Orwell Was Right

I think we should drop the tired and overplayed hashtag #fakenews and replace that with one much closer to what’s happening with alarming frequency;  #ignoringthefacts. One of my twitter buddies suggested #youcanthaveyourfacts at the same time as lamenting the prevention of the use of apostrophes in hashtags. A lament I share but that’s another story.

I know I bang on (great descriptive bang on) about comments to media columns. If I had any sense, I wouldn’t read them. I usually just end up with a headache due to clenching my teeth. But it is a sign of what people think and what they believe. It’s alarming how frequently in an effort to outdo each other the keyboard warriors just blithely ignore the facts. Then along comes the ‘like lemmings’. Dependent on whom the target of the assault is the like buttons can go into meltdown. I sit here shaking my head thinking did you even bother to read what was written? Or question the veracity of an opinion piece. Or even check updated news. It’s blatantly obvious they don’t.

A graphic example was a piece in the Australian on Friday featuring George Brandis and the Tony Abbott head-butt. The attack was rightfully condemned as it should be. Then, Brandis stated the attack had nothing to do with the SSM vote as had been reported ad nauseam through the day. Brandis was attacked left right and centre by the key board warriors. Most of them appear to be exLibs who salivate over any opportunity to stick it to the Govt.

One of the more irrational claims came from someone who accused Brandis of being useless. We could debate that based on fact. However, he then on went to claim Brandis should be sacked and stated, “But, what else would expect from someone who wouldn’t step in over the young lady from Canberra who was sacked for using an It’s OK to Vote NO, frame on Facebook.”  When it was pointed out Brandis can’t step in, that was completely dismissed but about 50 odd people liked the original comment. Not one person acknowledged the response that Brandis didn’t have the authority to interfere in a perceived case of unfair dismissal. Facts tossed out the window. Hands over ears, “We don’t want to hear that.”

For my sins I also commented that the only person who knew why the attack took place was the attacker. George Brandis (unless he had been advised by the police given an arrest had been made) and the rest of the know-alls  were merely speculating. That is fact; any claim was pure speculation. The key board warriors turned on me because I had the temerity to state the obvious. I received some absurd replies. But you get used to that. I was even accused of making a PC comment. How strange that a statement of fact is considered PC. At least I dodged the “fake-news” slur.

As it turned out Brandis was correct. I suspect he was already aware of that. The attack wasn’t SSM related. The attacker confirmed that in a media interview. A person who aided Mr Abbott said no mention was made of SSM. In fact Tony Abbott made no mention of the words SSM being used. It had been assumed the attack was due to Abbott’s vote NO position because the attacker wore an SSM sticker. That was probably a reasonable assumption to make at the time.

Hours after the facts became known people continued to bang on throwing scorn at George Brandis. Others resorted to using capital letters. The angry language used by the less articulate. Even more bizarre responses were directed to people like me who had pointed out the updated events. But.. “He wore the badge they cried, of course it was about SSM.” So the attacker confessed why he did it, stating vehemently he just hated Tony Abbott and he was under the influence. The key board warriors weren’t having it. Fact and truth just hurled out the window again. It was all BS. Of course it was about SSM. The verdict was ‘guilt by sticker’ according to the keyboard warrior’s court.

 Malcolm Turnbull didn’t escape either. In response to another column on the assault people got stuck into him because he hadn’t come out in public and said anything based on THEIR acceptability timeline. “ITS 9am HE HASN’T SPOKEN YET. HE’S A DUD, SACK HIM.” Of course the baying hordes completely ignored that Turnbull was touring. He had in fact phoned Mr Abbott to check on his welfare and he did have the assault reported to the Federal Police. That’s what a PM should do. Then later in an interview on 3AW Turnbull was forthright in condemning the assault. Of course that was met with silence. No, No, NO.. “We don’t want to hear that.”

People with agendas appear incapable of determining fact from fantasy even when the facts are put in front of them. Research has highlighted our collective IQ in Australia has declined. I don’t know if that’s a contributing factor. Or if it is the case that people are so brainwashed they just refuse to accept the truth/facts because it doesn’t suit their agenda. Or if they are incapable of understanding what’s truth and what isn’t. Perhaps it’s an attempt to see who can outdo each other on the comments bizarre meter (I really wish we had one of those). Someone should come up with a bizarre meter emoji.

It was George Orwell who said, “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” Isn’t that the truth!! It’s happening before our eyes. Truth and fact is now considered irreverent and hateful.  Why is that and how did to get to this point? I wish I had the answers. For me, the scary part is that more and more people appear to be buying into that. It doesn’t matter that what is in front them is true/factual they are not going to budge. Whatever is driving this, it’s concerning. We are moving into very dangerous territory. I just hope people wake up before it’s too late.

Before I go, another gripe.  We Over Play The Cry Wolf Card…

I feel compelled to say something about the furore over Big W’s Christmas-less tree boxes. What a storm in a teacup. I’m convinced that people just spend their days looking for things to be outraged about. This is one of those instances.

Any number of items on display in Big W has Christmas plastered across the front of the packaging. The tree packaging doesn't. Cue the meltdown. Up goes the cry.. “BOYCOTT Big W.” That’s followed by headlines, news reports, interviews and social media rampage. Once the outrage machine swings into action it follows a very predicable path.

I listened to Big W’s GM’s explanation of why the tree packaging didn’t include the word Christmas. It seemed perfectly reasonable to me. The trees are displayed in an area festooned with Christmas delights branded Christmas. So you don’t have to be a genius to figure out the tree is a Christmas tree despite the missing word. The trees come in a range of colours and coordinate with decorations around colour themes. Nice; it makes it easier to put your theme together.

Let’s face it. You buy the tree. You take it home and you put it up. When Christmas is over the tree goes back in the box and is shoved into the cupboard until next year. Frankly, if you don’t know it’s a Christmas tree because the box didn’t say so, then you’ve got bigger issues to worry about.  Seriously guys, it’s time that people took a chill pill. Save the outrage for those who refuse to acknowledge Christmas exists. There are enough of those to go around. Leave Big W alone, they are not one of them.  

We need to stop the emotional blackmail and intimidation

I am growing very weary of being bombarded by various groups and individuals telling me how and why I should vote the same way they will in the SSM postal plebiscite. I'm also somewhat dismayed by articles I've read and comments people have made that if their position isn't adopted they will no longer be friends with those who hold an opposing view. Some have even declared they will not even associate with someone who doesn't support them. Seriously how melodramatic and childish is that?

We've always prided ourselves as a society who embraced different opinions and who respected the right of others who differed from us. That is a sign of an intelligent, caring, enlightened, colourful and mature society. But that has changed and not for the better.

I'm proud to acknowledge I have friends and associates within my various circles with whom I don’t share the same beliefs; culturally, politically, environmentally and also on the topic of religion. I've learnt a lot from those people. That has led to some unique and fascinating relationships over the years. Not to mention some highly entertaining and robust dinner party discussions. In some cases I've changed my position based on compelling arguments. But above all I respect them as individuals and I would never wipe them just because we hold different views. I value them for who they are and the richness they bring to my life, not what they believe.

I had two so-called friends completely wipe me because of all people Donald Trump. I was stunned by that. Whilst I am an avowed conservative I could not support someone like Trump. I gave my reasons but I was flicked anyway. If the same were to happen should anyone become aware of how I vote on SSM, I would now consider that a positive. Why? I don’t want to associate with people who would simply shut me out for no other reason than a different opinion. Or to associate with people who want to live in a one dimensional society. A society where to be respected and accepted we all have to think the same and believe in the same things they do.

How I vote is my decision, no one else’s. I will be making my decision based on several factors. I will take into consideration my personal views.  In addition I'll consider the potential changes (if any) in law and what that will mean in the shorter and longer term across a number of spectrums. I won't cave in to emotional blackmail or intimidation from either side; Yes or No. In fact I find that behaviour nauseating.

"You've got to do what's right, or what you think is right. And  you've got to make tough decisions. And you've got to be willing to take on your friends when they disagree with you." Antonio Villaraigosa

That's true, we do. But above all we have to be true to ourselves. If others choose to cast us out because of it, it's their loss.

How Can You Respect the Opinions of Others, If You Don't Respect Yourself?

I had an interesting dialogue in comments in the Australian today as this relates to same sex marriage. In particular Cricket Australia jumping on the Yes bandwagon. I'm of the opinion sporting bodies should respect all their supporters and not take sides.

A poster, who goes by the name Damon made this comment. "It must be feeling very isolating being a no voter. They are already to some degree but ever increasingly pariahs." Odd wording but that is not the main point.

As I'm sure you will appreciate Damon's comment generated some responses of which some were perhaps unfortunate. But as Damon labelled those who disagreed with him Marxists, it probably didn't help.

My reply was granted pointed but I don't take kindly to being labeled a pariah. I pointed out labelling people pariahs for doing nothing more than not agreeing with him was immature and small-minded.

Damon replied, he was merely pointing out what must be for me a painful fact. He went on to say in years to come I would have to reconcile that I was on the wrong side of history and how embarrassing that would be. Of course Damon has no idea what side of history I'm on. I suggested he probably shouldn't make an ass of himself in jumping to conclusions.

What escapes people like Damon despite me suggesting it, is this. Reasonable people never feel like asses because others don't share their opinions. In fact they value a society where differing opinions are encouraged and respected. Some, may even change their opinions based on respectful and logical debate. Of course the ability to do that is usually associated with your level of commonsense, intellect, maturity and most importantly your upbringing.

Damon certainly wouldn’t win too many over to his side of the argument in 'spraying' everyone. But that's so typical today. No wonder it is a struggle to have sensible debate on issues that are important

I also think it’s sad that Damon admits, "It's hard to be respectful of a view when you don't respect it.". Damon fails to see you can disagree on an opinion but still respect the rights of others to hold opposing views. That means you don't label them pariahs. But then he summed it up when he said, "I care little for any respect you may have for my opinion. History will ultimately be the judge."

That probably explains a lot. How can Damon respect the opinions of others when it's blatantly clear he doesn't respect himself? If he did respect himself he would care what others think about his views.

What Was Pauline Hanson's Real Motive

If you are going to pull a stunt then at least stick to the story. Yes, I'm having a bit of a rant.

Pauline Hanson made a right prat of herself yesterday when she turned up to senate question time wearing a Burqa. I guess we should be used to her making a prat of herself. She has a long history of it. But mocking the parliament in pulling a moronic stunt is a new low even for her.

What is really telling is her true motivation. This was her question in the chamber yesterday.

My question is to Senator Brandis. “In light of what is happening with national security—there have been 13 foiled national threats against us from terrorism, three that have been successful, and Australians have lost their lives. Terrorism is a true threat to our country, and many Australians are very much in fear of it. What I would like to ask on behalf of the Australian people—considering a large majority of Australians wish to see the banning of the burqa—our two former prime ministers, Julia Gillard” – time expired

Hanson continued following Senator Brandis’s response.

“Is the Attorney-General aware that the burqa is not a religious requirement at all? Will the Attorney-General then ban the burqa in this house for the future as a security risk. Also, the fact is that the people of Australia have the right to see the face of a person that they elect to this parliament. They are the person who is actually going to be making decisions in the parliament on their behalf.”

She closed with this final supplementary question.

“If a person wears a balaclava or a helmet into a bank or any other building or even on the floor of the court, they must be removed. Why is it not the same case for someone who is covering up their face and cannot be identified? Will the government make changes to these laws?”

Her argument in the chamber was about security. Of course she was well and truly shot down on that point. So then Hanson turns up on every media show she could with the BS argument about repression of Muslim women.

Hanson doesn’t give a rats about the few Muslim women in this country who wear the Burqa. It really is only a few women. Some choose to wear it and no doubt others are forced to do so. Whilst I think it is a garment of repression, I respect the right of women who choose to wear it to do so. But Pauline Hanson as a champion of the Muslim Women’s rights? Give me a break.

If Hanson really cared about women's rights she would champion programs addressing English language for immigrant women when husbands deny them that right. That is a far bigger problem than a few women in this country being forced to cover. She would focus on the plight of women in indigenous communities. But of course she's not likely to grab headlines or attract hardcore support from the far right pushing those worthy causes is she.

So let's not kid ourselves. The Burqa was just a tool to enable Hanson to soap box her favourite topic .. Muslim bashing. It’s time her oxygen supply was cut off. Perhaps Tony Abbott could step up again. He did a good job last time.

I feel very sorry for Anthony Scaramucci

Some people cheer Trump on and other conservatives like me are equally critical of him. That's the way of politics. But this comment, has nothing to do with politics. It's about the cynical games of a psychopath. 

I am a fan of Will Black and his enlightening book, "Psychopathic Cultures and Toxic Empires." I will share this quote from the book because I believe it highlights what we see time and again with Trump's psychopathic behaviour.

"Indicators include self esteem being derived from personal gain, power and pleasure, lack of concern for feelings, needs and suffering of others and a tendency to exploit, deceive and coerce. They may appear charming but this is superficial and used to manipulate as, ultimately, other people are prey."

I was stunned when Trump announced the appointment of Anthony Scaramucci. Lets face it he was hardly qualified for the role. I was even more stunned when Scaramucci launched his disgusting attacks on others. But, the more I think about what just transpired the more it appears to be obvious that Trump has cruelly used a vulnerable man in the most callous way.   

Trump wanted Reince Priebus and Sean Spicer gone. He could have just fired them. That would have been the simplest solution. But that's not the Trump way. He wants to taunt and humiliate people. So Trump brought in Anthony Scaramucci. In actual fact Scaramucci never really got to start the job as his official start date wasn't until August 15th. Trump did this knowing that Scaramucci's nine-months-pregnant wife had just left him. Any man with an ounce of intelligence would realise no person in that position would be in the best frame of mind. Unless of course it was a deliberate and Trump was counting on Scaramucci not being in the most robust state mentally or emotionally and therefore easy to manipulate. 

Trump stood by and allowed Scaramucci to run roughshod over the White House. He did this knowing it would make Scaramucci a laughing stock and bring shame to the WH. But, it achieved Trump's aim. It was the final straw for both Spicer and Priebus who promptly resigned. Once Scaramucci had done the job, Trump callously turned around and fired him. Used and discarded before he got off the launching pad. 

I feel very sorry for Anthony Scaramucci. Trump obviously doesn't care that he may have destroyed what little is left of Anthony Scaramucci’s life. Scaramucci was merely a pawn in Trump's cynical game. For that matter Trump doesn't care that he’s severely harmed himself. He believes he'll be forgiven by his adoring followers it doesn't matter what he does. From where I sit, any man that uses and abuses people like that is nothing more than a full blown psychopath. The only question that remains, who is next in Trump's sick little games. 

"Trump isn't draining the swamp, he's building the cesspool."

Aren't we adult enough to have the discussion?

Tim Blair's rant "Environmental nonsense gone wild" in the Daily Telegraph today highlights the inability to debate the merits of some sensible environmental initiatives. 

As an example. Coles & Woolies removing plastic bags & replacing them with reusable bags isn't a bad thing. Thousands of sea creatures die awful deaths because of plastic bags. If humans were more responsible, perhaps this wouldn't happen. But sadly far too many aren't and that's a problem. 

The sticking point for many, will be the 15cents Woolies will charge for the replacement when the current bags as 'free'. But let's not fool ourselves we pay for them anyway it's just not obvious. All things considered, for me with an average of 8 bags per shop that's an extra $1.20. If I reuse 4 times that's 30cents per shop. It won't bankrupt me and if it helps remove bags from waterways and oceans good. 

Likewise, reducing car emissions has a lot of merit. But the debate wasn't even allowed to take place!! The mere hint and there was uproar. Car exhaust fumes are a health risk. You only have to look at China to see that. In our own backyard in Sydney exhaust fumes and tunnels is a frequent discussion. 

These are just two examples. But regardless, we should be mature enough to have the debate in the absence of emotive diatribe. Not everything should be judged on this ridiculous left, right divide. As adults we really are setting a very bad example. Time we grew up. 

Openness and transparency protect us from the powerful and the corrupt

“Openness and transparency are among the few protections we have to guard ourselves from the powerful & the corrupt.” That includes protecting us from those who are elected to lead us. I believe few would disagree with that statement.

For many of us, we rely on the media to provide that openness and transparency when they are reporting on what those in power say and do. Whilst we may not always agree with the opinions given (via the media), most people with a level of intelligence should be able to apply a level of logic in determining the validity of what they are being told. We always have access to transcripts, videos, past behaviours etc., to assist. We have many reputable news outlets out there; particularly independent news sites. We also have tools to help us determine media bias, fake news, click bait sites etc. Even MSM sites are capable of and do publish facts. Not everything they say is corrupt totally lies.

When those in power restrict media access I question why. What are they trying to hide? Because they in taking that action are then restricting our ability to decide if what we are being told is the truth. It is a dangerous precedent. It is even more dangerous when politicians and the leaders of countries do this. This applies to the leader of the so called free world; Donald J Trump. You can’t claim to be the leader of the free world if you suppress and continually attack the press because you don’t like what they report about you. As a result you scream fake news at every opportunity or you ban them. That is not the free world. That is dictatorship.

Unfortunately, Trump’s strategy is working on a lot of people. Despite reports citing official documents, credible first hand named sources and being published by credible news outlets there are those who just scream fake regardless. I had an interesting exchange on this very subject a few days ago. More surprising it was with a person who has appeared very open in the past. They do say if you repeat something often enough it becomes truth to some.

This highlights just another event where Trump has banned the media. Why? Who would know?

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/337354-trump-headlines-fundraiser-for-new-jersey-gop-lawmakerby

Freedom of speech and hence freedom of the press is crucial. Thomas Jefferson recognised that when he penned these words to Edward Carrington (an American soldier and statesman from Virginia).

“The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.”

While we might argue that our media (at times) does a poor job, the principle of freedom of the press cannot be restricted. Without it, we have no real protection. It’s down to us to decide if what we are being told makes sense and to make intelligent decisions on that basis. In other words free to decide for ourselves.

I read this recently. It was from a speech delivered back in 2006. How some people respond to this I suspect depends in some part on what side of the political divide they sit?

“It is precisely when the free press is telling us what we don’t want to hear, when it is challenging government officials, exposing government misconduct and refusing to be the unofficial mouthpiece of any government agency that the press stands most in need of constitutional protection.

A press that is the house organ for the government doesn’t need it. A press that only reports the good news, that ignores the scandals and the corruption, that is the cheerleader for every misadventure and stands silent when our liberties are threatened by the very government we created to protect them has no need of such protection.

It is only when the news media dares to speak truth to power and reveal the truth about those who wield power that it requires the umbrella of constitutional protection……….”

We have to demand open honest reporting from our media. But to blacken everyone because we don’t like what they say is nonsense. I fear anyone who tries to control what the media can and cannot access more so that the media itself. History tells us we should.

Are We Losing The Battle?

A question I ask myself more frequently today. Are we losing the battle against those who seek to divide and suppress? I fear the answer is yes.

I've always prided myself on being a positive person. I prefer to be optimistic rather than pessimistic. I have faith that regardless of how dire things appear, good will triumph over evil. If it doesn’t then it wasn’t meant to be. But regardless something positive will emerge from the ashes of ruin. I believe when people who hold similar values stand together, we can overcome and emerge a stronger, more united and vastly better society. But I find myself becoming increasingly more pessimistic about the society of today. I see a society ever more divided and fractured. Those who seek to divide us and suppress us are winning. I see decency and values sacrificed in the name of revenge and retribution.

The realisation this is happening deeply saddens me. The saddest part is watching the change. Particularly on social media I’ve watched people whom I have admired as being open and receptive to the ideas of others change. In the past they didn’t always agree with a particular position or point of view but they respected the rights of others to think differently. Polite exchanges ensued and at times opinions were changed. Many of those same people now condemn you and turn on you if you deviate from their script. They actively then go one step further and whip others up to turn against you. It reminds me of reformed smokers but worse. I’ve been on the receiving end of this a few times as I know others have.

I have said this before but it's worth repeating. It saddens me that we no longer appear willing to judge people on who they are as citizens and not what political party they belong to. Or what religion they follow. Or what general beliefs they hold. It saddens me that some people will never be forgiven regardless of how many times they atone for their perceived sins because of what they are; based on the same parameters; political, social leaning, religion, or even the colour of someone's skin.  It disgusts me that regardless of how appallingly other people behave are as long as they are in ‘the camp’ they're forgiven.

A good example of this is the recent re-election of a Governor in the US. Only a day before this Governor had assaulted a journalist for being persistent (in other words doing his job) in asking a question. The journalist was knocked to the ground and repeatedly punched. But of course he was just a journalist. That was OK. The Governor was re-elected and even received praise from the President. Belting people up has never been OK and certainly shouldn’t be acceptable from people in positions of power. But the campaign against journalists has worked. They are viewed as pariahs and now people feel bashing them is OK and worst still they reward the basher. Anyone who defended the journalists (be they Republican or Democrat) was attacked left right and centre for doing nothing more than standing up for decency. Staunch Republicans who spoke up were treated worse than the Democrats. The people against the media/journalist lobby in full swing. Decency is losing and those who seek to divide and suppress win.

Those on the right say it is a left wing problem. Those on the left say it a right wing problem. Both sides are guilty. Two recent examples of that in Australia;

We have all witnessed the bullying of Margaret Court for doing nothing more than exercising her right to choose based on her beliefs.  She stated her reasons for no longer wishing to promote or fly Qantas because of their Chief Executives gay marriage crusade. She made that public. That is her right. The letter she wrote was to the point. Who she was, why she made the decision and offering her willingness to discuss with those involved. But now the Gay Lobby demands her name be removed from a sports arena. They want her stripped of her legacy in recognising her as a great sportswoman who has contributed much to her sport. Whether you agree with gay marriage or not Mrs Court should be able to decide who she promotes and who she doesn’t. She should be able to do that without being ripped asunder by people with axes to grind. One person even said to me yesterday she deserves everything she gets. That’s such a vengeful attitude. People can voice their opposition without resorting to verbal violence and demanding a person’s legacy be destroyed just because you don’t agree with what they have said. After all, Mrs Court hasn’t murdered anyone. But if the arena management caves in as a result of the relentless campaign which is sure to follow then those who seek to divide and suppress will have won again. Time will tell.

People are frequently seeking to expunge from history anything they find distasteful. Such as removing Margaret Court's name from an arena. In the US they have gone as far as taking down statues. It is lunacy and in my opinion dangerous.

On the other side we witnessed the recent assault on Yassmin Abdel-Magled’s over her comments on ANZAC day. Whilst I don’t agree with her references to Manus and Nauru I do have some sympathy toward the plight of people in Syria and Palestine. Too often the world turns a blind eye to the suffering of people there, particularly the children and the elderly. However, what she said was ill-advised, insensitive and very poorly timed. ANZAC day was not the day to say it. If she'd said on another day I suspect it would have largely gone unnoticed. Bad judgement on her part. In her defence she did remove the offending tweet and she apologised for it. But that wasn’t enough. As in the case of Margaret Court people out for revenge demanded more. In the end she was sacked from her job at the ABC but many still haven’t let up. Nothing short of total destruction will sate their appetite for revenge. Anyone who had the temerity to say hang on, she realised she was wrong and has apologised received the same treatment. They were cut out like a diseased calf in a muster. Isolated and condemned. Hence the dividers in full swing win again.

There was a time when an apology was gracefully accepted. This was often followed by a message, “Thank you, we accept your apology. Learn from the error and don't repeat it”. Those days are long gone. Now nothing short of complete destruction appears to appease. So why even bother saying sorry. It doesn't seem to make any difference if you are in the 'target group'.

I don't think I am sounding overly alarmist in saying this. Each time those who seek to divide wins we see the demands grow ever harsher. People are trolled and threaten. On social media, particularly Twitter one of the standard practices when someone objects to something you say is to reply copying others in their camp. The copy to's then RT copying in more people and the next thing you know it is  an all out attack.

We read far to often of people being physically assaulted or living in fear of being physically assaulted for nothin more than expressing an opinion. People have been sacked and had careers ruined. Petitions kick-off like wildfire and worst yet some people end up as headlines in the news for days on end. Ridiculed and humiliated for what they say. We don't treat murders and rapist as bad as that. The media has a lot to answer for in promoting this behaviour. They feed the frenzy shame on them.

I can’t predict where this will end. But history gives us an indication and it isn’t good. When I see decent people joining the assault squads that really does saddened me. I don’t mind admitting it frightens me to think of what the future might look like.

Marcus Aurelius said, “The best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury.” I believe that is true. So every time we join in vicious assaults on people just because we don’t agree them. Every time we fall into the trap of playing the divide game and acting exactly like those ‘who performed the injury’ we let them win. I pointed this out recently and was met with a typical response. They started it. In suggesting that perhaps two wrongs aren't the solution the response was, ‘they’ want war we’ll give them war. I didn't see the point of saying you are behaving just like those you condemn. This, is a game of no winners and as a society, we collectively sadly are the losers. I just hope people wake up to that fact before it is too late.

Dear Prime Minister Turnbull - Yes Me Again

We have a problem. You know that. Note, I didn’t say you have a problem because I believe we all need to take some ownership for it. That said, as the leader of my party (and the government) it’s down to you to dig us out of the quagmire.

I will start this in saying I think you get a rough deal from many conservatives. That’s not to say you don’t deserve a lot of the criticism you receive. However, many within our conservative ranks harbour grudges (that seems to be the way of the world). A large percentage is incapable of accepting people over time change their views on certain issues. Or should I say they won’t accept you personally can change your position without an ulterior motive! At the risk of raising the indignation of people who may read this, its rubbish to think people’s opinions never change. Even people you don’t like. We frequently change our positions on key issues as we become better informed or our circumstances change.

I can’t and won’t claim credit for the bulk of this comment. It came from one of the smarter contributors to comments in the Australian but it highlights the issue beautifully. He posted it in response to the article on Alan Jones demented rant this week.

I will leave the ‘delcon’ reference in, in the interests of accuracy although personally don’t like labels.

It reads; “One has to wonder what would satisfy the delcon brigadiers. Abbott signs the RET, Turnbull retains the policy, but Abbott is a true Liberal and Turnbull ‘labor-lite’. Abbott increases taxes, Turnbull cuts taxes, but Abbott is a true Liberal and Turnbull ‘labor-lite’. Abbott introduces a ridiculous paid parental scheme, squibs it, Turnbull leaves it where it belongs, but Abbott is a true Liberal and Turnbull ‘Labor-lite’. Turnbull has a go at reforming 18C, Abbott squibs it. But Abbott is a true Liberal and Turnbull ‘Labor-lite”. Abbott establishes the TURC, Turnbull implements the key recommendations with the ABCC. But Abbott is a true Liberal and Turnbull ‘Labor-lite’. There are none so blind”

There is more we can add to the list. As an example; Tony Abbott increased the refugee intake in response to the Syrian crisis. You maintained the target, ensured the strictest of vetting and ensured it was majority of Christians who we took in.

Tony Abbott threatened to reform the senate and then squibbed it. You drove through a change of rules (a start if not the optimum result yet). You called a double dissolution and won the election albeit by the slimmest of margins.

Once again in these cases Tony Abbott is a true Liberal but you are viewed as ‘Labor-lite’ and in the case of refugees you are labelled a Muslim appeaser. Labor wouldn’t do any of the things you have done. So labelling you ‘Labor-lite’ is absurd.

So yes, I do believe you get a rough deal from certain conservatives over your image. I also think you get a rough deal given the policies the government has managed to get through the senate in recent months. Particularly budget repair initiatives albeit once again not everything, a lot has been achieved. More than was getting through previously.

I will go off topic for a minute. Like most Grans my Granny was a firm believer in idle hands need work. I’m also a believer in idle hands mischief make and can be very destructive. I speak from personal experience here. This leads me back to our problem and the so called feud with Tony Abbott.

It appears to me, Mr Abbott who fuels a lot of discontent (despite his prostrations to the contrary) needs a meaningful job. He has idle hands so he mischief makes. It must be difficult to make the switch from being on the front-line for so many years to now play on the benches. He has been in the position of Cabinet Minister, Opposition Leader and then Prime Minister. As a backbencher he has significantly less to occupy his time. He’s an action man. We know that. So he creates his own action none of it very positive.

You and government can’t afford to keep dealing with the distractions when there are more important things to focus on. You can no longer afford to have the good things that are achieved be drowned out by media feeding off snipping and infighting. This is what leads to perception issues. Sadly, far too many people don’t read beyond a headline.

I’m one who believed keeping Tony Abbott out of the cabinet was a good idea. I’ve had a rethink based on current events and I think now is the time to give him a job. It will take leadership courage to do it, but it will achieve positive outcomes. Let's face it what do you have to lose? It raises you above pettiness. If you give him a job based on a portfolio that he’s extremely fond of giving advice on, it means he needs to ‘put his money where he’s mouth is’. 

Tony Abbott delivered on two key election promises with the help of some very good ministers. Stopping the boats and removing the carbon and mining taxes. After that he stumbled. So now is the time to test just how good he really is. Give him something meaty that he now appears to be the expert on and that will deliver a significant result to the electorate. Support him and if he delivers let him take the credit. We all win in that case; him, you, the government and the electorate. If he fails bury him once and for all.

Don’t give him something soft like Indigenous Affairs. That won’t test him. Scrapping or restructuring the Human Rights commission and reengineering 18C would be meaty. As would cutting the RET. Both of these are on his five point plan. They are measurable as well. If successful we should see a lift in the polls.

This comment was made in an article titled the Golden Age of Phony. ‘It used to be said that actions speak louder than words. But today, the opposite is true; words matter more than actions. People are judged by intentions not results.”

We see this in our political arena daily. Media drives it. Social media feeds off it.  It’s time to reverse the trend and get back to profiling results. We need to stop the chatter. Remove the soap boxes and get results onto the front page and infighting and snipping off. Let Tony Abbott show he can actually contribute to the results that he believes are game changers. But contribute in a meaningful way with actions not words. The question is, will you do it?  

A Time To Reflect

It doesn’t matter whether we are Christians or not. Or whether we are believers or not. We all need to take time to reflect. This time of year is one of those times. 

We live in a wonderfully complex, beautiful, but deeply damaged world. A world that's too often uncaring, unforgiving, cruel, and devoid of second chances. Daily, we are regaled with doom and gloom. The media and others seem to prefer that to promoting the positive things that happen every single day. 

We have world leaders who appear to be more intent on destruction than unity. It's easy to be overwhelmed and to lose faith and to lose hope. Even those of us who live comfortably in stable, prosperous countries are not immune from this. Let's face it far too many of our western leaders are consumed with blowing up someone else's home. Eagerly cheered on by people who live thousands of miles away corralled in the safety of their comfy homes. I suspect they wouldn't be so gung-ho if someone was blowing up their world. 

Now more than ever we need leaders who will instil belief back into the community. Leaders who will do something positive about helping to deliver a better world than the one far too face today; both real and perceived. It is up to us to force them to do it. Assuming that's what those of us who live in the free world want. I don't mind admitting when I read what's posted on social media I have my doubts. 

Perhaps the world is a manifestation of what so many project. I agree with Mr King when he says; 

"I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality... I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word." ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Let's not lose hope that one day we will all enjoy a better world than many live in today. God bless.